Posts Subscribe to Posts RSS feed

Introduction Have you ever tried using the internet without a mouse? Most people take their mouse for granted. But there are many people who can’t use one. People with physical disabilities who can’t operate a mouse People with repetitive strain injuries like carpal tunnel syndrome People with temporary arm injuries Power users who simply find keyboards more efficient For these users, the question “Can I use this site with just a keyboard?” is crucial. ...

Introduction In Atomic Tests vs. Holistic Tests: A New Testing Methodology, we discussed balancing Atomic and Holistic tests. Now we need to address how we’ll “assert” and “document” these results. This is where Assertions come in. The scoring and conformance model covered in WCAG 3.0 Conformance Model: Changes After A/AA/AAA also connects with Assertions. This is because they provide a way to supplement areas not covered by quantitative tests with organizational processes and evidence. ...

Introduction When running a static blog, “scheduled publishing” and “build limits” often become problems at the same time. In particular, building on every commit can easily hit build limits on platforms like Cloudflare Pages. In this post, I’ll walk you through the approach I’m actually using: running a publish check with GitHub Actions every 3 hours to handle scheduled publishing. The key idea is “check only at set intervals, and publish only when needed.” ...

Introduction When people hear “accessibility testing,” they often think of a checklist: “Does this button have alternative text?” “Is the contrast ratio high enough?” WCAG 2.2 is built around clear pass/fail checks like these. WCAG 3.0 moves toward a broader unit of evaluation, aiming to consider overall user experience quality. That shift naturally changes how we test. We now combine fine-grained checks (Atomic) with real-world contextual evaluation (Holistic). This shift directly connects to the score-based conformance model discussed in WCAG 3.0 Conformance Model: Beyond A/AA/AAA. The weight you give each test type can change the score and the level you reach. ...

Introduction In the previous post, we looked at why WCAG 3.0 reorganized “Success Criteria” into “Outcomes.” This post focuses on changes to the conformance model. WCAG 3.0 aims for a different approach than WCAG 2.x, but it is still in the Editor’s Draft (2026-01-05) stage and is not finalized. Conformance levels, scoring approaches, and evaluation methods are still being explored. Important: This post is based on the WCAG 3.0 Editor’s Draft (2026-01-05). The draft can change at any time, and the document itself is explicitly marked as a work in progress. ...

Introduction Running a blog in both Korean and English revealed an interesting problem. When sharing blog links internationally, visitors often land on the Korean page. Those who can’t read Korean are confused, right? Similarly, when Korean readers click on English post links shared in Korean communities, they face the same issue. While there’s a language switcher button in the header, new visitors often struggle to find it. This isn’t user-friendly, and from an accessibility perspective, it’s not ideal either. ...

Developers often make the same mistake after learning ARIA. They understand the concept, but they are unsure when and how to apply it in real projects. ARIA practical guide main visual with ARIA attributes highlighted in a code editor Cover image example: visual that symbolizes applying ARIA attributes · Generated by Nanobanana AI You may have heard the phrase: “ARIA is a last resort.” Use semantic HTML first, and add ARIA only when native HTML is not enough. This guide follows that principle and shows how to use ARIA effectively in real work. ...

Introduction “1.3.1 Info and Relationships - Level A” If you’ve worked with WCAG 2.2, you’re familiar with this format of Success Criteria. Numbers, levels, and clear test conditions. This structure has been the standard for web accessibility for over 15 years. However, as we explored in the previous article, this approach had limitations. “Websites that pass checkboxes but are actually unusable” are proof of this. WCAG 3.0 has completely redesigned the structure itself to address this issue. It didn’t just add items—it changed the way we evaluate accessibility. ...

Introduction Blogs built with Static Site Generators (SSG) are incredibly fast and secure. However, adding dynamic features like comments requires careful consideration. This blog uses Giscus, a GitHub Discussions-based comment system, but there was one inconvenience. Comments only appear at the bottom of each post, making it difficult to see at a glance which articles have active discussions. So I built three features: Display comment counts in post lists - See which articles have ongoing conversations Show recent comments on the explore page - View recent blog activity at a glance Create an all comments page - Browse all comments in one place This article shares the process of bringing dynamic comment information to a static site using GitHub GraphQL API while maintaining optimal performance. ...

Introduction “Our site passed WCAG 2.1 AA 100%, but screen reader users still can’t sign up.” I keep thinking about this comment I heard at a conference last year. They passed accessibility audits, got the green badge, but users with disabilities still couldn’t use core features. This is the biggest dilemma facing WCAG 2.x today. If you’re a developer or designer working on web accessibility, you’ve probably heard of WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines). Recently, a new guideline called WCAG 3.0 has emerged, and many people are wondering: ...