Skip to content
Blog post thumbnail: WCAG 3.0 Expanded Scope: Beyond the Web - WCAG 3.0 Draft extends its scope beyond ‘the web’ to cover mobile, wearables, Web of Things, XR, and the tooling ecosystem. Here’s how that changes the practical questions your team needs to ask, compared to WCAG 2.2. (https://www.codeslog.com/en/posts/wcag-3-expanded-scope-beyond-web/)

WCAG 3.0 Expanded Scope: Beyond the Web

Introduction This is the sixth post in the WCAG 3.0 series. This time I want to unpack what “beyond the web” actually means in practice. The earlier posts looked at structure, testing, and Assertions — now it’s time to get clear on “how far does the scope actually reach?” Important: This post is based on the WCAG 3.0 Working Draft (2026-02-20). The Draft is subject to change, and this post may be updated accordingly. ...

Published date: 2026-02-23 · Reading time: 5 min · Word count: 2074 words · Author: Isaac
Blog post thumbnail: Assertions: A New Unit for Accessibility Evaluation...

Assertions: A New Unit for Accessibility Evaluation

Introduction In Atomic Tests vs. Holistic Tests: A New Testing Methodology, we discussed balancing Atomic and Holistic tests. Now we need to address how we’ll “assert” and “document” these results. This is where Assertions come in. The scoring and conformance model covered in WCAG 3.0 Conformance Model: Changes After A/AA/AAA also connects with Assertions. This is because they provide a way to supplement areas not covered by quantitative tests with organizational processes and evidence. ...

Published date: 2026-02-01 · Reading time: 2 min · Word count: 792 words · Author: Isaac
Blog post thumbnail: Atomic Tests vs. Holistic Tests: A New Testing Approach - Compare WCAG 3.0’s quantitative/qualitative testing flow with WCAG 2.2’s success-criteria model. We cover Atomic/Holistic concepts, view/process scope, and how tests connect to scoring from a practical perspective. (https://www.codeslog.com/en/posts/wcag-3-atomic-holistic-tests/)

Atomic Tests vs. Holistic Tests: A New Testing Approach

Introduction When people hear “accessibility testing,” they often think of a checklist: “Does this button have alternative text?” “Is the contrast ratio high enough?” WCAG 2.2 is built around clear pass/fail checks like these. WCAG 3.0 moves toward a broader unit of evaluation, aiming to consider overall user experience quality. That shift naturally changes how we test. We now combine fine-grained checks (Atomic) with real-world contextual evaluation (Holistic). This shift directly connects to the score-based conformance model discussed in WCAG 3.0 Conformance Model: Beyond A/AA/AAA. The weight you give each test type can change the score and the level you reach. ...

Published date: 2026-01-26 · Reading time: 4 min · Word count: 734 words · Author: Isaac
Blog post thumbnail: WCAG 3.0 Conformance Model: Moving Beyond A/AA/AAA - Based on the WCAG 3.0 Editor's Draft, this post summarizes the Foundational/Supplemental/Assertions model and how it differs from WCAG 2.2. (https://www.codeslog.com/en/posts/wcag-3-scoring-conformance/)

WCAG 3.0 Conformance Model: Moving Beyond A/AA/AAA

Introduction In the previous post, we looked at why WCAG 3.0 reorganized “Success Criteria” into “Outcomes.” This post focuses on changes to the conformance model. WCAG 3.0 aims for a different approach than WCAG 2.x, but it is still in the Editor’s Draft (2026-01-05) stage and is not finalized. Conformance levels, scoring approaches, and evaluation methods are still being explored. Important: This post is based on the WCAG 3.0 Editor’s Draft (2026-01-05). The draft can change at any time, and the document itself is explicitly marked as a work in progress. ...