Skip to content

Assertions: A New Unit for Accessibility Evaluation

WCAG 3.0 Assertions document accessibility procedures automated tests cannot verify. This post covers the 28 assertions in the March 2026 Draft and how they differ from WCAG 2.2's Conformance Claim.

Published date: 2026-02-01 · Updated 2026-07-30 · Reading time: 3 min · Word count: 1100 words · Author: Isaac

Atomic Tests vs. Holistic Tests: A New Testing Approach

Compare WCAG 3.0’s quantitative/qualitative testing flow with WCAG 2.2’s success-criteria model. We cover Atomic/Holistic concepts, view/process scope, and how tests connect to scoring from a practical perspective.

Published date: 2026-01-26 · Updated 2026-07-30 · Reading time: 5 min · Word count: 1034 words · Author: Isaac

WCAG 3.0 Conformance Model: Moving Beyond A/AA/AAA

Explore how WCAG 3(3.0)'s conformance model moves beyond A/AA/AAA. Covers the Core/Supplemental/Assertions structure, the returning Bronze/Silver/Gold levels, and views/processes-based scope, based on the March 2026 draft.

Published date: 2026-01-25 · Updated 2026-09-10 · Reading time: 10 min · Word count: 2016 words · Author: Isaac

WCAG 3.0 Structure Anatomy: From Success Criteria to Outcomes

WCAG 3.0 restructures accessibility into Guidelines, Outcomes, and Methods. Covers the 153 requirements (Core 92 + Supplemental 61), Atomic vs. Holistic Tests, and a login-form example vs WCAG 2.2.

Published date: 2026-01-19 · Updated 2026-10-17 · Reading time: 20 min · Word count: 4179 words · Author: Isaac

Questions I Asked at the AI Public Service Evaluation

Introduction I just returned from the AI Agent Scenario Competition Citizen Evaluation Panel held in Seoul. The panel consisted of expert judges and citizen evaluators, with the final scores reflecting both expert evaluation and citizen evaluation. Since the evaluation details are confidential, I can’t discuss individual teams or specific results. However, through this experience, I was able to clearly define what standards I use when evaluating AI public services. So in this post, rather than “how this team performed,” I want to record what questions I asked and why I thought those questions mattered. ...

Published date: 2025-12-31 · Reading time: 7 min · Word count: 1370 words · Author: Isaac

A $35 Evaluation Panel — Why I'm Still Going to Seoul

Introduction Let me be honest — this choice is a losing deal on paper. I’m spending a whole day, paying for transportation out of my own pocket, and the compensation is only about $35 (50,000 KRW). Yet, I’m heading to Seoul tomorrow. I wanted to organize my reasons step by step. View from a train window - a journey to somewhere Photo: Dieter K / Unsplash The Evaluation Panel Offer and My Decision One day, while browsing the NIA (National Information Society Agency) website as usual, I discovered the Public Institution Website Citizen Evaluation Panel. Since then, I’ve been grateful to participate in the public web/app citizen evaluation activities for two years straight. The rewards and achievements may seem small, but the process and experience have been building up as personal assets. ...

맨 위로