Explore how WCAG 3(3.0)'s conformance model moves beyond A/AA/AAA. Covers the Core/Supplemental/Assertions structure, the returning Bronze/Silver/Gold levels, and views/processes-based scope, based on the March 2026 draft.
Introduction Running a blog in both Korean and English revealed an interesting problem. When sharing blog links internationally, visitors often land on the Korean page. Those who can’t read Korean are confused, right? Similarly, when Korean readers click on English post links shared in Korean communities, they face the same issue. While there’s a language switcher button in the header, new visitors often struggle to find it. This isn’t user-friendly, and from an accessibility perspective, it’s not ideal either. ...
Developers often make the same mistake after learning ARIA. They understand the concept, but they are unsure when and how to apply it in real projects. ARIA practical guide main visual with ARIA attributes highlighted in a code editor Cover image example: visual that symbolizes applying ARIA attributes · Generated by Nanobanana AI You may have heard the phrase: “ARIA is a last resort.” Use semantic HTML first, and add ARIA only when native HTML is not enough. This guide follows that principle and shows how to use ARIA effectively in real work. ...
WCAG 3.0 restructures accessibility into Guidelines, Outcomes, and Methods. Covers the 153 requirements (Core 92 + Supplemental 61), Atomic vs. Holistic Tests, and a login-form example vs WCAG 2.2.
WCAG evolved from 1.0 to 2.2 over 26 years. This post explains why WCAG 3.0 exists: the All-or-Nothing dilemma, checkbox accessibility, and the shift from pass/fail checklists to user outcomes.
Introduction Recently, I started building and operating a blog using Hugo with the PaperMod theme. Using someone else’s theme has the advantage of quick setup, but not everything fits my needs perfectly. After customizing many parts to match my preferences, I noticed some issues with the code blocks. Line numbers were implemented with <table> tags. While this doesn’t violate accessibility guidelines, it felt not semantic. Moreover, I wondered: what’s the experience for screen reader users? I found a better approach using CSS Counters. ...
This post is a record of grappling with web accessibility, public web services, and the responsibilities of developers from direct, hands-on experience. Between law, technology, standards, and reality, I try to answer the question: “Are we really building for everyone?” In the previous post, we confirmed that the Digital Inclusion Act asks “what is usable?” Then this question remains: If AI is a system that makes decisions? If users can’t understand automated decisions? How do we distinguish between content created by generative AI? ...
A people-centered look at Korea's Digital Inclusion Act (effective Jan 22, 2026): how it differs from the Framework Act on Intelligent Informatization, kiosk usability obligations, and impact assessment duties developers should know.
This piece is a record of wrestling with web accessibility, public services, and a developer’s responsibility from the field. Between law and technology, between standards and reality, I try to answer: “Are we really building for everyone?” While working on web accessibility for years, I found myself repeatedly hearing a similar question: “We’re certified and passed the checklist. Isn’t accessibility done now?” When I first heard this question, I nodded briefly. Many public websites did meet WCAG 2.1 / KWCAG 2.2 standards, passed screen reader tests, and satisfied contrast requirements. ...
Introduction I just returned from the AI Agent Scenario Competition Citizen Evaluation Panel held in Seoul. The panel consisted of expert judges and citizen evaluators, with the final scores reflecting both expert evaluation and citizen evaluation. Since the evaluation details are confidential, I can’t discuss individual teams or specific results. However, through this experience, I was able to clearly define what standards I use when evaluating AI public services. So in this post, rather than “how this team performed,” I want to record what questions I asked and why I thought those questions mattered. ...